Estimate the number (or concentration) of "spins"/radicals/paramagnetic species using the absolute quantitative method by sigmoid integral as well as by the instrumental parameters without the need for a standard sample with known concentration/amount of radicals/"spins". The calculation assumes that the sample height middle point, within an EPR tube, matches the cavity/resonator center.
Usage
quantify_EPR_Abs(
integ.sigmoid.max,
instrum.params = NULL,
path_to_dsc_par,
origin = "xenon",
qValue = NULL,
tube.sample.id.mm,
point.sample.factor = 8.51e-09,
fill.sample.h.mm,
eff.cavity.h.mm = 23,
fn.B1.Bm.fit.y = c(1.00179, -0.00307086, -0.0265409, 0.000297603, 0.000223277,
-4.53833e-06, -4.1451e-07, 1.89417e-08, -1.48241e-09),
fn.B1.Bm.fit.y.max = 0.28,
Norm.const = NULL,
Temp.K = NULL,
S = 0.5
)
Arguments
- integ.sigmoid.max
Numeric value or vector of the entire EPR spectrum sigmoid integral.
- instrum.params
Named numeric vector, containing instrumental parameters required for the quantification =>
PmW
power of the MW source in mW BmmT
modulation amplitude (magnetic flux density modulation, \(B_{\text{m}}\)) in mT TK
temperature in K mwGHz
applied microwave frequency in GHz
to record the continuous wave (CW) EPR spectrumDefault:
instrum.params = NULL
because they are primarily extracted from thepath_to_dsc_par
based on theorigin
.- path_to_dsc_par
Character string, path (can be also acquired by the
file.path
) to.DSC/.dsc
or.par
(depending on the OS, see theorigin
argument)text
files including all instrumental parameters from the EPR machine. If theinstrum.params
is already defined, thepath_to_dsc_par = NULL
. Otherwise, BOTH thepath_to_dsc_par
AS WELL AS theorigin
MUST BE SPECIFIED !- origin
Character string, corresponding to software which was used to obtain the EPR spectra on spectrometers, because the files are slightly different, whether they were recorded by the "WinEpr" (
origin = "winepr"
) or by the "Xenon" (default). Iforigin = NULL
as well aspath_to_dsc_par = NULL
, theinstrum.params
have to be set.- qValue
Numeric value of the sensitivity
Q
factor. For the processed EPR spectra by the{eprscope}
package theinteg.sigmoid.max
is usually normalized by theQ
value. Therefore, default:qValue = NULL
(corresponding to1
).- tube.sample.id.mm
Numeric value, which equals to internal diameter (in
mm
) of the tube/cell used for the quantitative EPR experiment.- point.sample.factor
Numeric value, corresponding to point sample correction factor, provided by the cavity/probehead manufacturer. Value for the standard Bruker rectangular cavity is set as default.
- fill.sample.h.mm
Numeric value, referring to sample height (in
mm
) within the tube/cell.- eff.cavity.h.mm
Numeric value, which equals to effective cavity/probehead height/length, usually provided by the probehead manufacturer.
- fn.B1.Bm.fit.y
Numeric vector (coefficients) of the polynomial degree from 5 to 12. Coefficients for the standard Bruker rectangular cavity are set as default.
- fn.B1.Bm.fit.y.max
Numeric value, corresponding to maximum value of the polynomial fit. Value for the standard Bruker rectangular cavity is set as default.
- Norm.const
Numeric value, corresponding to normalization constant (see
quantify_EPR_Norm_const
). Default:Norm.const = NULL
in case if the EPR spectrum was normalized by such constant either during the measurement or processing. Otherwise it must be provided by thequantify_EPR_Norm_const
.- Temp.K
Numeric value, temperature value in
K
. Because theinstrum.params
also contains temperature input one may choose which definition (Temp.K
orTK
) is taken for the calculation. EitherTemp.K
orTK
CAN BE ALSONULL
but NOT BOTH !! In the latter case, default value298 K
is considered.- S
Numeric value, total spin sample quantum number. For radicals
S = 0.5
(default).
Value
List of the following quantities:
- N.cm
Number of spins per effective centimeter. It is defined as the cm around the maximum, \(\pm 5\,\text{mm}\), of the intensity distribution curve/polynomial fit within the cavity \(f(B_1,B_{\text{m}})\) from the equation shown in
Details
.- N.cm3
Number of spins per \(\text{cm}^3\).
- c.M
Concentration of spins/radicals in \(\text{mol}\,\text{dm}^{-3}\).
Details
There are two approaches how to quantify the number of paramagnetic species/radicals/spins.
The relative one needs a standard sample with a known spin number and can be evaluated
by the sigmoid integral ratio of the sample under study and that of the standard.
While the absolute method do not need the reference sample, it requires
a precise cavity signal calibration as well as standardized cell geometry. Both are provided
by the EPR instrument and lab-glass manufacturers (see e.g. Hirschmann-Laborgeräte (2023), References
).
In case of absolute quantitative EPR analysis the sigmoid integral (its maximum value),
\(I_{\text{sigmoid}}\),can be used to calculate the number of "spins"/radicals/paramagnetic species,
\(N_{\text{Spins}}\) (see also References
) =>
$$N_{\text{Spins}} = I_{\text{sigmoid}}\,/\,[(c/f(B_1,B_{\text{m}}))\,(G_{\text{R}}\,t_{\text{C}}
\,N_{\text{Scans}})\,(\sqrt{P_{\text{MW}}}\,B_{\text{m}}\,Q\,n_{\text{B}}\,S(S+1))]$$
where the quantity notations possess the following meaning (parentheses denote whether it is an instrumental
or sample dependent parameter):
Quantity Symbol | Meaning/Short Desription |
\(c\) | Point sample calibration factor (instrumental). |
\(f(B_1,B_\text{m})\) | Spatial distribution of the microwave \(B_1\) and modulation amplitude within the cavity/probehead/resonator (instrumental). |
\(G_{\text{R}}\) | Receiver gain (commonly in \(\text{dB}\) units (instrumental)). |
\(t_{\text{C}}\) | Conversion time (commonly in \(\text{ms}\)) which is an analogy to integration time in other spectroscopies (instrumental). |
\(N_{\text{Scans}}\) | Number of scans/accumulations during the experiment (instrumental). |
\(P_{\text{MW}}\) | Microwave power (instrumental). |
\(B_{\text{m}}\) | Modulation amplitude (instrumental). |
\(Q\) | Q-Value or Q-Factor characterizing the resonator/cavity/probehead sensitivity (unitless and instrumental). |
\(n_{\text{B}}\) | Boltzmann factor for temperature dependence (instrumental-sample). |
\(S\) | Total electronic spin quantum number (sample). Commonly, for radicals \(S = 1/2\). |
Almost all summarized quantities are instrument-dependent. Most of them correspond to the essential
parameters for the experiment and can be easily acquired from the .DSC
/.dsc
/.par
file(s).
The Boltzmann factor describes the population of spin states
by \(\exp{(\Delta \varepsilon)\,/\,(k_{\text{B}}\,T)}\), where \(\Delta \varepsilon\) denotes
the energy difference between the basic spin states, \(k_{\text{B}}\) is the Boltzmann constant
(available from syms
) and the \(T\) represents the temperature in \(\text{K}\).
For temperatures \(\geq 4\,\text{K}\) and continuous wave experiments where
the \(\Delta \varepsilon = h\,\nu_{\text{MW}}^{}\) is constant, this factor may be very well estimated
by the following formula:
$$n_{\text{B}} = h\,\nu_{\text{MW}}^{}\,/\,(2\,k_{\text{B}}\,T)$$
The term \((G_{\text{R}}\,t_{\text{C}}\,N_{\text{Scans}})\) actually corresponds to normalization constant
which is available from quantify_EPR_Norm_const
.
Besides the above-described parameters which can be easily estimated, there are however characteristics
that requires precise calibration and usually are provided by the spectrometer manufacturers.
The spatial distribution of the microwave, \(B_1\), and modulation
amplitude, \(B_\text{m}\), influences the intensity of the sample predominantly along the \(y\)-axis direction
(i.e. when moving the sample tube up or down within the cavity). Such intensity distribution,
depending on the cavity/probehead for different sample length and positions, can be approximated by a polynomial
(see the fn.B1.Bm.fit.y
argument) that is supplied by the manufacturer as well (the coefficients
of the polynomial can be sometimes found in .DSC
/.dsc
/.par
file(s)). For quantitative
purposes, such polynomial is integrated over the length of the sample.
References
Eaton GR, Eaton SS, Barr DP, Weber RT (2010). Quantitative EPR. Springer Science and Business Media. ISBN 978-3-211-92947-6, https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-211-92948-3.
Weber RT (2011). Xenon User's Guide. Bruker BioSpin Manual Version 1.3, Software Version 1.1b50.
Hirschmann-Laborgeräte (2023). “Ringcaps.” https://hirschmannlab.de/en/produkt/ringcaps/.
Mazúr M, Valko M, Morris H (2000). “Analysis of the Radial and Longitudinal Effect in a Double TE104 and a Single TE102 Rectangular Cavity.” J. Magn. Reson., 142(1), 37–56. ISSN 1090-7807, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1999.1915.
Portis AM (1953). “Electronic Structure ofF Centers: Saturation of the Electron Spin Resonance.” Phys. Rev., 91(5), 1071–1078, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.91.1071.
Mailer C, Sarna T, Swartz HM, Hyde JS (1977). “Quantitative Studies of Free Radicals in Biology: Corrections to ESR Saturation Data.” J. Magn. Reson. (1969), 25(1), 205–210, ISSN 0022-2364, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(77)90133-0.
See also
Other Evaluations and Quantification:
eval_integ_EPR_Spec()
,
eval_kinR_EPR_modelFit()
,
eval_kinR_ODE_model()
,
quantify_EPR_Norm_const()
Examples
if (FALSE) { # \dontrun{
## quantitative analysis (determining the
## radical concentration `c.M`) of a sample measured
## at different temperatures
## all data summarized in `data.tidy.integ`
data.quant <- mapply(function(x,y)
{quantify_EPR_Abs(x,
instrum.params = c(PmW = 2.518,
BmmT = 5.4e-02,
TK = NULL, ## 298 K
mwGHz = 9.530265),
path_to_dsc_par = NULL,
origin = NULL,
tube.sample.id.mm = 2.86,
fill.sample.h.mm = 23,
Temp.K = y)$c.M
},
data.tidy.integ$Area,
data.tidy.integ$Temperature_K
)
} # }